Only in certain circumstances such as having your king in check with no squares to move to and the only way to stop the check is to capture the piece delivering the check.
Yes, as long as it doesn't put him in check.
The objective of chess is to checkmate the king, where the king is in check by a piece and it cannot block the check, move to another square, or capture the piece checking the king.
by asking nicely! Check the instruction manual
You don't take/kill a king in chess. You have to put it into checkmate, ie, there are no moves the opponent can make with any piece, to take the king out of check. When this happens, the game is over.
No, a king cannot capture a queen if it is in check. In chess, when a king is in check, it must make a move to get out of check, either by moving to a safe square, capturing the attacking piece, or blocking the attack. Since the king is unable to move without resolving the check, it cannot capture the queen.
Yes, as long as the move doesn't leave the King in Check from another source.
You never take the king. You say check to alert the person their king is in danger. If they can block, move, or capture to get out of check, the game continues. If they can't it's checkmate and you've won.
King of the Kill was created in 1994.
To Kill a King was created in 2003.
I wouldn't know, there's a knot in my brain. king or kill. king or kill. king kill king kill
No, because before you kill the king, but you're about to after your opponent's turn, they must get out of check because your queen is checking the king. In other words, they must use their own chess pieces to block the queen or they can move the king into a different spot that is not checked.