Yes, because it is in-direct and so if it was shot and the ball went into the goal with no one touching it, the goal would not count.
An indirect free kick must be touched by another player before it goes into the net to count as a goal. A direct free kick does not.
no she isn't
There are only ever indiurect freekicks if a keeper picks up a pass back, and indirect freekicks means someone has to touch the ball before it goes into he net to score, direct means it can go straight in.
The question makes no sense. What is the situation? A live ball may be touched by any player, with no revolutions required.
A direct free kick...
The kicker of a direct free kick may not touch the ball a second time until another player has touched it or it goes out of play.
That depends if its out of the park no. If its in the park yeah.
No. The ball must be touched by another player (see Law 13).
yes. it is where the ball is, not where the fielder is.
If the crosses the goal line (but not into the goal), and last touched an offensive player; it is a goal kick. It is a corner kick if it was last touched by a defending player.
Once any player has touched it after a throw-in a goal may be scored.
This is from the NFL rulebook:"Any eligible offensive player may catch a forward pass. If a pass is touched by one eligible offensive player and touched or caught by a second offensive player, pass completion is legal. Further, all offensive players become eligible once a pass is touched by an eligible receiver or any defensive player."Since the pass was touched by either an eligible receiver or a defensive player and then caught it is a legal catch.