The king can capture a piece and put the opponent's king in check by moving to a square where it can capture the opponent's piece while also threatening the opponent's king.
No, it is not possible to achieve checkmate in a game of chess without putting the opponent's king in check.
Yes, it can, as long as it doesn't put the king in check. PS, it's "capture", not "kill".
Check
In chess, the objective is to checkmate the opponent's king, which means putting the king in a position where it cannot escape capture. The king can be captured by moving a piece to a square that attacks the king, known as a check. The opponent must then move the king out of check or block the attack. If the king cannot escape capture, it is checkmated, and the game is over.
The king is said to be in check.To get out of check, the opponent must either (1) capture the checking piece, (2) interpose a piece between the checking piece and the king, or (3) move the king out of check.
Check
by putting our AGN no or by putting our passport no
No, except for when the only way to get out of check is to capture the piece that is attacking your king.
Yes, in chess, it is customary to say "check" when putting the opponent's king in danger.
The King is not allowed to be in check. If a piece is on a square where if the King were there, the King would in check, the King isn't allowed to capture it.
Yes, in chess, you say "check" when you threaten the opponent's king with capture on the next move.
Yes if it's the only way to escape check.