No, They play a complete inning so each team gets a chance to bat, and if one team is ahead at the end of the inning then they win the game.
i.e. The visitors score 2 runs in the top of the 10th inning, the home team will get a chance to bat, and if they score fewer then 2 runs, the visiting team wins, if they score 2 runs, they go to the next "extra inning", if the home team scores 3+ then the home team wins.
** When in extra innings if the home team wins, the game ends when the winning run is scored, in the scenario above, when the 3rd run is scored -- the only way the home team would get credit for more then 3 runs, is if the game ended on a homerun, then in that case, all the runs scored on the home run would count and the game would be over
Chat with our AI personalities
In most cases it's the classical 50/50. How well they do the rest of the match is of course very important. Just one goal won't do the trick.
My team scores first in above 90% of the matches we play, but we don't win those 90%
Let's say the football team plays thirty games. They score first in every one of these games. They won the first three games, lost the next eight, won the next four, got a tie the next five and won the next ten. They have now won 17 games, lost eight and gotten a tie five times. Why? The best player on the team may have been in a bad mood or sick - maybe his girlfriend broke up?
To get to the point, it's a 50/50, maybe 60/40 chance to win if you score first.
That would be 50 in a hundred or 60 in a hundred, to answer your question correctly whilst still managing to sound just a little bit dim-witted.
Not necessarily, but it is very likely if you look at stats for games you can usually see that the team who scored first won. It is slightly demoralizing to be scored against right away.
No because last year Bears scored play and they lost!!!!!!!!!!!!! and i was routing for them we thought we were gonna win but we lost