answersLogoWhite

0

Frank Dux like most celebrities is continually subjected to misleading and sensationalized reporting, that often results in unsubstantiated allegations being made and repeated.

For example, the most common allegation of wrong doing stems from an editorial written by Los Angeles Times reporter who turns out is the one exposed as deceptive in a case of libel and slander of Frank Dux v. Robert Brown, Alexander McColl, Larry Baily and Soldier Of Fortune Magazine, Case No: BC198883, Superior Court Of California, Los Angeles County - like what happened to P. Diddy Colmes, the Los Angeles Times held up fraudulent evidence as credible by which to financially benefit

Shortly after the movie Bloodsport's release in May of 1988, a staff writer published an editorial in the Los Angeles Times' local San Fernando Valley Metro Section accusing Dux of making everything up. The editorial is written in a format one may easily mistake for an objective article. Johnson states that Dux's Kumite trophy didn't come from a 1975 tournament in the Bahamas, but rather it was merely ordered and picked up by Dux at a trophy shop just a few miles from his Southern California home.

This alleged trophy receipt was exposed in a court proceedings to be an obvious fabrication, thus withdrawn from evidence due to these facts:

  • The alleged trophy receipt is a Xerox document where Frank Dux's signature is cut and recopied from another document onto the receipt, in addition to giving the incorrect address for him.
  • Anyone could create this on their home copier.
  • The trophy inscription name is incorrectly spelled D-U-K-E-S and not D-U-X (contrary to the correct spelling inscribed on Dux's trophy).
  • The alleged trophy receipt is dated 1979, which is three years after the trophy was first viewed in Dux possession, in 1976.
  • the photo that was taken of Dux holding the trophy that appeared in Black Belt magazine, November 1980, was snapped three years before the date on the LA Times receipt
  • No resemblance exists between the LA Times photocopy of a trophy receipt and Dux's trophy. The alleged receipt the LA times relies on is for a three tiered trophy with two gold cups on and four judo figures. The Dux kumite trophy is a two foot pedestal base with a large engraved silver bowl as its crown - it is not even remotely close regarding its size specifications and materials to the description on the alleged receipt.

In the interview with Martial Arts Illustrated, Dux also stated that the article's author, was an acquaintance of his ex-wife and that the article was written at the same time that he was embroiled in a bitter divorce.

One can view and compare the alleged trophy receipt against Dux Trophy as it appeared in Black Belt magazine.

In addition, another misleading source is the book Stolen Valor, which it turns out is self published. The author states that he used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of Dux's Marine Corps records, and thereby discovered that Dux served in the Marine Corps Reserves in the U.S. from 1975 to 1981, never seeing any overseas action.

The main problem with Stolen Valor author's research is that it ignores the fact that Frank Dux never claimed to be a veteran of the Vietnam War in the first place. "I never represented myself in my book or otherwise as a Vietnam War veteran, was in the CIA, or murdered anyone," Dux said, in Asking The Masters. Thus, Dux could hardly be exposed as a fraud for making claims it turns out he never made.

The Legal Analysis and Breakdown of Stolen Valor which is the crux of Dux's court case of libel and slander Dux vs. Soldier of Fortune magazine that repeats and makes unsubstantiated allegations of their own reveals the book Stolen Valor in which the allegations appear is self-published, not subjected to unbiased independent external scrutiny, unlike Dux book The Secret Man,HarperCollins, 1996 that according to the Artesia Daily Newspaper, July 18, 2008 is vetted (facts and claims substantiated) by the law firm of Slade and Metcalf for HarperCollins, prior to its publication.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it true Frank Dux was exposed as a fraud?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Art & Architecture

Who started bloodstone villains?

The homie Frank Dux from the Peptos, and lil Jack White


What is the scientific name for squids?

-- The common market squid is Loligo opalescens. However, there are over 300 classified squid species, so you will have to be more specific. -- Giant boy-- The scientific name for the giant squid is Architeuthis dux.== ==


Who has the most wins in mixed martial arts history?

Two of the fighters with the highest fight totals are Dan Severn(109) and Travis Fulton (245). But since MMA was underground for a while it is hard to determine many older fighters actual fight totals. A website to check on most records is called www.sherdog.com. They have a fighter finder that is hands down the best in the world for mma fighters.


Where did Edmund Barton go to school?

He was educated at Fort Street High School and Sydney Grammar School, where he was twice dux and School Captain and met his life-long friend and later fellow Justice of the High Court of Australia, Richard O'Connor. He graduated with first class honours and the University Medal in classics from the University of Sydney, where he also demonstrated considerable skill at batting (but not in fielding) at cricket. · http://www.nla.gov.au/barton/pages/primeminister-02.html


Why did King Arthur become famous?

He was a king, that's why we have the Legend of King Arthur and Excalibur, the sword in the stone, and the lady of the lake and Merlin and Guinivere and Lancelot and the whole thing. Pastscapian wrote: Arthur of the earlier legends and pseudo-histories (8th/9th/10 Centuries) isn't called a king. He's either 'Lord of the Islands' or a dux bellorum (leader of battles). In fact, he's seen more as a superhuman, or even minor deity figure. The Protector of Britannia. He is only later actually called a king and even an emperor in one legend.