It could bring in more contestants for the Olympic Games and more viewers for it. If they win a medal, they could score even more viewers (and more money) by becoming a new famous athlete.
So athletes who cannot compete in the regular Olympics can compete. They get the same sense of accomplishment, recognition and satisfaction as athletes in the regular Olympics, and people think it's important that they should be able to.
They did get money to go to the olympics in the past
yes they do
Athletes put lots of money in training I play hockey and I'm 12 and my parents have a lot cold hard cash on me
No
really it depends on what you mean becaause australia has spent $350 million just on the London Athletes and it is roughly $700 billion since we had joined the olympics.
Athletes are not given prize money for winning gold, silver or bronze etc. at an event.
No. The athletes have sponsors and donations to help pay for the costs.
No the british athletes just get the medal and no insentives. They believe in the desire to compete in the Olympics. Not to compete for money or incentives.
Athletes do make to much money and I dont think that they should make this much.but then they do deserve it...
Many athletes make lot of money in a year.undenaible
Of course.... India should..... One of the reason for bad performance by India is due to not spending enough money on them... The performance by athletes are because of their own efforts... It's not because of the support govt. and the people of the country. They get very little. Very less than they deserve.