yes they do
They did get money to go to the olympics in the past
It is all about money and TV ratings. More people watch the Olympics when people they have heard of are competing than when people that they have not heard of are competing. This allows for more money to be made by those that are putting on the Olympics and televising the Olympics.
No
So athletes who cannot compete in the regular Olympics can compete. They get the same sense of accomplishment, recognition and satisfaction as athletes in the regular Olympics, and people think it's important that they should be able to.
Professional athletic competitions are a form of entertainment. The public likes to see really good athletes competing with each other. Therefore, they buy tickets to sporting events, and athletes are paid with part of the money raised by those ticket sales.
really it depends on what you mean becaause australia has spent $350 million just on the London Athletes and it is roughly $700 billion since we had joined the olympics.
Athletes are not given prize money for winning gold, silver or bronze etc. at an event.
No. The athletes have sponsors and donations to help pay for the costs.
No the british athletes just get the medal and no insentives. They believe in the desire to compete in the Olympics. Not to compete for money or incentives.
it depends on which college and which sport
Olympic Athletes are not paid for their service. They represent their country in the games for no more monetary reward than the value of the medal. Athlete's that succeed in the Olympics then come home to generous paparazzi. They are paid for public appearances, parades, sponsorships, speech's, and much more. Sponsorships account for the vast majority of the money an Olympian makes.
The athletes are unpaid, minus the prize money they receive for winning medals. Outside of the Olympics the various athletes' professional annual salaries sum to over $9.