they have had better teams
of course.
The Los Angeles Lakers have won 16 championships, but there is one teams that has more, the Boston Celtics with 17, so out of The Spurs and The Lakers i would probably go with the Lakers.
Heck no. Celtics are good but the Lakers would stomp them so bad.
The Celtic-Laker Rivalry is the oldest, most famous, and (in my opinion) the best rivalry in the NBA. Championships: Celtics: 17 Lakers: 16 Finals Appearances: Celtics: 20 Lakers: 30 Division Titles: Celtics: 27 Lakers: 31 Missed Playoffs how many times: Celtics: 10 Lakers: 5 All-Time Winning %: Celtics: 59.4 Lakers: 61.8 So, overall, Lakers because of their numbers and better players. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Lakers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Celtics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Celtics_seasons
No
The Lakers have home court advantage during the 2010 NBA Finals because they had a better regular-season record than the Celtics. Los Angeles was 57-25; Boston was 50-32.
Los Angles Lakers is my team Azeez. Whoever we play we smash them. Boston Celtics is some trash. Lakers is better than boring Celtics. We go to the "NBA FINALS" ever year if we play the Celtics they can never beat us. Can`t stop "Kobe Bryant". Will make a shot in your face. "LOS ANGLES LAKERS ALL DAY". "BOO Celtics".
That's up to your personal opinion:In 2010-2011, the edge goes to the Lakers. They have won more games against the Celtics, which indicates that they're better. They have also won more championships over the last 20 years, while the Celtics glory years date to the 1960s and 1980s. After losing in 2008, the Lakers topped the Celtics in 2010. The Lakers also reach the finals more than the Celtics do. Overall, the Lakers are better now especially because Shaq retired in 2011.Celtics won a game, and then got out, but the Lakers lost all without winning.Boston Celtics Because they have more titles than the L.A. Lakers.Lakers because more championships against the Celtics and they have Kobe Bryant.
la lakers
The Cleveland Cavaliers are better because LeBron James shoots the ball better than Kobe Bryant.
The Los Angeles Lakers are an overall better team.
no, the lakers are too good of a team. perkins would not have made the celtics win. the celtics needed better shooting from there big 3 guys. that's why lakers won p.s. rando cannot shoot three's