the cf4 is the better bat it has great pop
cf4
they r both good bats, but the cf4 is better.
It is a matter of choice.
Yes no wa im sayn
neither is better they have the same amount of pop.
the better bat would definitely be the easton stealth. the demarini cf4 is a good bat too but if the bat is hit on the wrong part of the bat, the ball will not go like it does on the easton. the stealth has a massive sweet spot/barrel and also has a lot more pop than the demarini.
either is a good bat but i had the sv12 and it cracked
cf4s usally cost 300 but i got mine in clerence for 200
The SV12. I just got mine from Dicks Sporting Goods for 200 dollars and used it in my game tonight and hit a homerun. For me Demarini's dont have a very good trampoline effect and they are too expensive but the SV12 was great and you could really feel the ball being pushed by the bat. Hope this helps
Ibelieve that the combat is better. I have used the cf4 and I don't believe the bat has that much pop. I have the combat -3 version and it's got a lot of pop. The only negative about it is that it doesn't hold up to well.
It depends if it is a Catalyst you need to break it in other bats you do not not a alloy aluminum bat but a composite bat like cf4 freak b2 dabomb and others those bats you have to
The H2 and the Triton are much better bats, But if I had to choose, the Exogrid would be my choice. This is backed up by the national association of baseball bats and the composition of alloys based on a Harvard study.