they r both good bats, but the cf4 is better.
the cf4 is the better bat it has great pop
cf4
It is a matter of choice.
the better bat would definitely be the easton stealth. the demarini cf4 is a good bat too but if the bat is hit on the wrong part of the bat, the ball will not go like it does on the easton. the stealth has a massive sweet spot/barrel and also has a lot more pop than the demarini.
the cf4
neither is better they have the same amount of pop.
No I have tried both and I like the cf4 better I think the ball flys off better
either is a good bat but i had the sv12 and it cracked
The SV12. I just got mine from Dicks Sporting Goods for 200 dollars and used it in my game tonight and hit a homerun. For me Demarini's dont have a very good trampoline effect and they are too expensive but the SV12 was great and you could really feel the ball being pushed by the bat. Hope this helps
CF4 is better because it was made before the BBCOR came out. It will go an extra 50 feet
Ibelieve that the combat is better. I have used the cf4 and I don't believe the bat has that much pop. I have the combat -3 version and it's got a lot of pop. The only negative about it is that it doesn't hold up to well.
yes