No , only upon the pawn's promotion to a piece that then checks the king may you then say "check" .
Depends by which rules and standards you are going by. Some say no and if you take another piece to get out of check-mate then it was technically just check, other rules state that its check-mate if all other avenues of movement are blocked and the only way out of check-mate is to take the piece then yes it is possible.
hmmm...Not Sure but check on other places in the Internet
Yes, if the king is in check, the next move must take the king out of check. You do not necessarily have to move the king, you could take the attacking piece, or block the check by moving a piece in the way.
depends on how you use it. The moon that orbits the The Earth is called The Moon so in that case it is a "naming word" (proper noun) but "a moon" is just a piece of rock that orbits a planet, so no it is not in that case.
A founded check is when a piece in the middle of the king and the piece moves away.
Yes, the king may capture the piece that is checking it.Yes, but only if that piece is on a square adjoining him, as a king has mobility of only one square per move.
If the king is not currently in check and has nowhere to move without being in check, it is stalemate, which is a draw. However if any other piece of his can make a move (i.e a pawn), then it is not stalemate, and you are forced to move whatever piece can be moved.
check for power. then check ground. one or the other is open probably ground. could be socket for bulb. there is a piece of crap plastic piece at bottom with a spring that could be rotted or not possitioned right.
you get them in check and they cant block, move, ortake the piece that is forcing you in check
Any opponent piece, except the opponent king.
A King in Chess may take any other piece except another King. The reason is that in order for a king to take another king, the first king would have to move adjacent to the other king, which is an illegal move.
maybe