The only real difference is the countries that are invited to participate.
All countries that have a National Olympic Committee may send athletes to the Olympic Games.
All countries that are members of the Commonwealth of Nations or are a territory of a member of the Commonwealth of Nations may send athletes to the Commonwealth Games.
There are a few sports competed in the Commonwealth Games that are not competed in the Olympics (lawn bowls, squash, and Netball). Olympic sports canoeing, sailing, and volleyball have never been competed in the Commonwealth Games.
No. The Commonwealth Games have no connection with the Olympics, although some athletes may participate in both.
The Commonwealth games are of those countries that are a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, of which there are 53 countries. They are mainly countries that were in the British Empire. Olympics is the whole world.
The Olympics has more sports than the Commonwealth Games.
they are two deferent competitions both games are only for the unprofessional players but the commonwealth games are only for countries that used to be in the commonwealth =)
The Commonwealth games are a sort of mini Olympics open to people from members of the British Commonwealth
No difference
The common wealth games were invented as a alternative Olympics
No, but there has been a Commonwealth Games held there in 1974.
The first such event, then known as the British Empire Games, was held in 1930 in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The name changed to British Empire and Commonwealth Games in 1954, to British Commonwealth Games in 1970 and assumed the current name of the Commonwealth Games in 1978.
-Mini Olympics -Brings everyone together
No, Golf was not one of the sports included in the 2014 Commonwealth Games. It is actually a 2016 Olympics sport.
Because certain commonwealth countries can't compete in the Olympics so the commonwealth games is a chance for those countries to compete in front of the world.