Yes. It's not elite, but it's not bad.
It is a fairly anaerobic race due to the fast speed you are going at the hole time. I guess you could say the first 200m are aerobic because you are getting into the race, but you are going so fast (if your good enough) to have it be all run without oxygen.
yes y wouldn't it be?
Yeah i think its really good. I'm a 13 year old girl and my personal best for the 800m is 2.50.
5k?
1.59.50 :)
A time of 5.445 is impossible in a barrel race. A time of 15.445 might be good, but it depends on the size of the arena.
1:59:09
You should be running an 800m at around 2min
if your a good runner you should be around 2:00 im 14 ran a 2:15 but that's just meeeeeeee
3-4 minutes give or take. I'm not sure how old this question (and the answers are) but the info isn't at all accurate. From someone who is in the middle of the junior olympic circuit for track, and the father of a 10 year old girl who runs the 800m, I can offer some accuracy here. First off, when you ask what's a good 800m time, I would start with what's good in elementary school meets around the country. In those races, a 3 minute 800m will generally win the race. When you compete regionally and nationally among the fastest 10 year old girls in the country, a 3 minute 800m isn't competitive. In those races, you'll see the very fastest 10 year old girls running 2:30. It should be noted that there are very few of these girls. Then between 2:35 and 2:40 are the next tier of runners. These girls are extremely fast, and arguably elite runners, but they're just a few seconds behind the truly fastest. So a 3 minute 800m is quite good, but it's really relative to the level you want to compare it to.
Time(length)
Time(length)