No. A fumble on the quarterback/center exchange is always charged to the QB, regardless of whose error it was.
The holder
Through the 2012 season, the Steelers active leader is quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, with 17 fumble recoveries.The active leader on defense is linebacker LaMarr Woodley, with 9.
its where the qb is sacked but if he fumbles it its where the line of scrimage is If there is no fumble, hence no turnover, then the negative yardage is where the quarterback is officially tackled. On a fumble and turnover and downed recovery by the other team, I believe that the negative yardage would then be calculated from the line of scrimmage to where the opponent recovers.
That depends on the angle the ball travelled. If the receiver is behind or exactly to the side of the quarterback and the ball travels at an angle parallel to or away from the line of scrimmage, the throw is considered a lateral and would be a fumble if the receiver did not catch it. If the receiver is in front of the quarterback and the ball travels at an angle towards the line of scrimmage, the throw is considered a forward pass and would be an incomplete pass.
No, for the player to get credit for a sack he would have to tackle the quarterback behind the line of scrimmage. The quarterback would have to be declared down for it to be counted as a sack. If the quarterback is down then there couldn't be a fumble. So therefore there could be no fumble recovery.
fumble is when you use one hand to do something and not the other
The Fumble happened in 1987.
Yes, a fumble is a fumble, the cause doesn't matter.
No!
Fumble - band - was created in 1967.
Foreward lateral pass from quarterback to receiver for the touchdown, rush play from the fullback or halfback for the score, quarterback scramble or sneak for the score, defensive interception ran back for the score (pick 6), fumble recovery for the score. Perhaps a safety? Sacking the quarterback or tackling the ball carrier in their own endzone for the score. I think I've got them all.