The king in chess may capture any other chess piece except the enemy king .
A King in Chess may take any other piece except another King. The reason is that in order for a king to take another king, the first king would have to move adjacent to the other king, which is an illegal move.
The capture of the King is the penultimate goal in the game of chess .
The king can take another piece anytime, but it is not smart to do so until perhaps the last moves of the game, if at all.
Yes, any piece can take a queen. The only time a King could do it is to get himself out of the queen's check.
Depends by which rules and standards you are going by. Some say no and if you take another piece to get out of check-mate then it was technically just check, other rules state that its check-mate if all other avenues of movement are blocked and the only way out of check-mate is to take the piece then yes it is possible.
To checkmate the opponents king by putting a piece in a position where it could theoretically take the king, and the king cannot move away, block, or take the attacking piece. The game ends without the king actually being taken, however.
Yes, if the king is in check, the next move must take the king out of check. You do not necessarily have to move the king, you could take the attacking piece, or block the check by moving a piece in the way.
No, except for when the only way to get out of check is to capture the piece that is attacking your king.
In chess, there is no limit to how many opposition pieces can be taken by one piece - although, neither sides' King can be taken.
You don't take/kill a king in chess. You have to put it into checkmate, ie, there are no moves the opponent can make with any piece, to take the king out of check. When this happens, the game is over.
No , a king may not take another king because it violates one of the rules governing the game : a king may not move into check regardless of circumstance .