Yes, if he will not be in check when he takes the sideways square. The king can move into all the spaces 1 square from it taking a piece or not.
No, in the game of chess, the king can only move one square at a time in any direction: vertically, horizontally, or diagonally. The king cannot move in a "sideways" direction as that would put it in check.
when you use a check to steal money from someones account or give a fake check to the store to buy something and got away with it for a while. its also a FEDERAL CRIME
You can use steal in a sentence like: " A robber can steal lots of things by braking into houses.
The two thiefs conspired to steal the diamond watch on Christmas Eve.
No, this allows your opponent to take your king, ending the game before your rook could retaliate.
Yes, if the king is in check, the next move must take the king out of check. You do not necessarily have to move the king, you could take the attacking piece, or block the check by moving a piece in the way.
read you book;;Huck didn't wanted the king and the Duke to steal the money from kind girls. So he did steal the money.
Banacek - 1972 To Steal a King 1-5 is rated/received certificates of: Australia:PG (video rating)
yes.
king tut's hat
If what you mean by "leaving your king open" is not moving it out of check if your opponent puts your king in check, then yes, that is an illegal move. If your king is in check you mustmove to protect it. If you mean simply that you leave your king in the center of the board without castling or other protection, then it is not an illegal move. It may (and probably will) result in your king coming under attack very quickly, however.