Well it depends between what swimmer and what rugby player as there are some swimmers with very big shoulder muscles and there are some with small shoulder muscles but viseversa there are some weak shoulder muscled rugby players and strong shoulder muscled rugby players..
So is thought... But the reality is, that you can't compare different species. Its like comparing a rugby player and a swimmer!
ballet dancers are sorry its clear that they are as test have proved this
Richie McCaw's father told him when he was 8 years old that he would enjoy rugby more if he got fitter. Richie said that this comment from his father stuck with him as his father didn't say he would be better if he was fitter, he said that 'he would enjoy it more' which motivated Richie.
Rugby Players
99-100lb for a swimmer and for a volleyball player 100-200lb
Pat Quinn - English Rugby Player Charles Quade - New Zealand Rugby Player D.L.J Quigley - Canadian Rugby Player
This answer depends on your definition of fitness. If you include speed, agility, power, endurance, strength, etc. as measures of fitness then truly a rugby player would be the fitter. Most soccer players are agile, fast, and have good endurance but they usually lack power and strength. The average soccer player is 170lbs while the average rugby player is 190lbs. Given that both have relatively low percentages of body fat, the rugby player would have more lean muscle than the soccer player. Well in long run rugby players are always running around and never stay in the same place but in football they can stand in one place so therefore rugby is a fitter sport
Lovell Rugby is neither a sport or a player. Its an online rugby store based in the United Kingdom. They specialize in clothing and equipment to play rugby with.
James Small - rugby player - was born on 1969-02-10.
Depending on the code its either Rugby union which is the 15 player game or Rugby League which is the 113 player game
Fred Hutchinson - rugby player - was born in 1867.