Tough question.
It really depends on what you are looking for. What does "famous" mean?
For example one particular player may be more famous than another particular player and yet be a worse player of cricket.
Also, cricket thows many challenges at its participants and few - if any - can master all of them.
However, if you would like a few names to "go Wiki" with, here are some;
Me
Sorry, couldn't resist...
Brearley
Border
Lloyd
Sobers
Richards
Willis
Thompson (possibly the fastest bowler that has ever - so far - lived)
Marshall
Knott
Gower
Botham
Waugh (Steve - not his brother Mark)
Gavaskar
Khan
Malinga
Miandad
Tendulkar (possibly the best batsman that has ever - so far - lived)
Chanderpaul
Walsh
Holding
Lillee
Hadlee (a great fast bowler - such a shame he had to play for a poor cricketing nation at the time - New Zealand)
There are, obviously, loads more but that should keep you occupied for a half-hour.
Yes. It is a fast form of cricket. Players who are thirsty of thrill and adventure prefer this form of cricket.
15-20 players. 11 players on field. 4-9 substitute players.
Craig Bellamy
2006
yes but no if players are chasing low scores they go easy on the bowling
Al Kaline
As of now, India.
Cricketers can play cricket for 20 years but the maximum is 21.
Sachin Tendulkar. Having played for almost 20 years, he is probably the most watched cricketer in histpry.
Darren Lockyar, played for about 20 something years.
six rasay
faisalabad