answersLogoWhite

0

jockstrap, it protects and get the job done.


ANSWER 2: WHICH MAKES SENSE

Jockstraps are exposing, uncomfortable, chafe easily, and are otherwise obsolete. Compression shorts (w/ cup for protection) are super comfortable, they don't expose anything, can be worn as regular underwear, and many come with padding for legs. Unlike the nasty jockstrap, compression shorts keep the muscles warm and keep your muscles in place, lowering the chance of injury or sprains greatly.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
More answers

Compression shorts provide support for your thighs and glutes. But jockstraps do a better job supporting your genitals and keeping things from bouncing. They also tend to be cooler, since there's less material.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Depending how they fit, you might want to. Sometimes the legs are tight, but they don't really support your genitals - a jockstrap is designed to keep them in place better.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
User Avatar

Yes! you should it is better

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

i guess

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can a jockstrap replace compression shorts in running?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp