Pete Sampras elevated these 4 tournaments (Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open) to their current status by saying they were all that mattered.
No, they have been called grandslams since the thirties, more than 30 years before Sampras was even born
Before the advent of the open era of tennis competitions in April 1968, only amateurs were allowed to compete in established tournaments, including the four Grand Slams.
because five would be too many
a grand slam. it represents the four largest events of the season. wimbledon, us open and two others. to win a grand slam, you must win all four. so only 1 grand slam is available per year.
The first amateur to win a grand slam in tennis was Don Budge. He was an American from California, and won the event in 1938.
5250
In tennis only the grand slams have best of 5-set finals. Previouisly, ATP master series finals used to have 5 set finals but that is now diminished to 3 sets.
Jimmy Connors and Andre Agassi are two former, top US players who won 8 singles Grand Slam titles.However, the question does not stipulate whether the grand slams need to be only singles, or whether they are just Grand Slam titles[period]. There may be others, male or female, who won 8 Grand Slams, inclusive of singles, doubles and mixed doubles titles.
Fernando Tatis
He is famous for being a professional tennis player and more specifically for his success on clay. He was the world no 1 tennis player and has won numerous grand slams. He is also one of only a few tennis players who has won all 4 grand slam titles.
Fernando Tatis. He is the only player to ever do this
Lou Gehrig holds the record for most grand slams in a career at 23, but Alex Rodriguez has a reasonable chance of breaking that. Check the link below for a list of every MLB player who has hit at least two grand slams in a career. This includes Tony Cloninger, a pitcher who hit two grand slams in one game -- and hit only nine other home runs in his entire career.
No, because it, to an extent, overcomplicates things. You see, for the past century there have been four grand slams. It is now the standard by which we measure greatness. I do not say that without a slam you aren't great, but the greats we consider today are those that win slams, whether it be a one slam wonder or someone like Roger Federer (or Rod Laver, if you're an oldie and take his Pro Slams into consideration). Adding another slam would not only add more pressure for professionals to gain a slam, but it would also make it easier for people to get one. The slams are supposed to be exclusive, and benchmarking against the greats of the past would become imbalanced as they would all have only four chances per year to acquire a slam.