Roger federer is more good looking so nadal must be more ugly!
They are both terrific sports men. Nadal can beat Federer on a regular basis. Federer has won more titles. Nadal is only 24 and has loads of years left to get more titles than Federer. Federer was number one for the most consecutive years. Nadal is much more entertaining. Overall, I would have to say: Rafael Nadal
Nadal beat Federer in 2008.
Nadal HAS THE MOST WINS!!!! the series between these 2 is 13-7, Therefore Nadal has beaten federer more times.
Roger Federer
Roger Federer
Federer: Switzerland Nadal: Spain
Federer rules! Federer is much better. P.S It is spelled Nadal not Nadel.
Since Federer was on a historic streak of 11 Majors in 4 years, Nadal was the underdog and Federer was the favorite.
Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer in the longest Wimbledon final match ever to win the men's single title in 2008. He had lost t he previous 2 finals to Federer, but finally came thru in 2008.
He got more points than Federer
Yes because he still has more points.
This is a very controversial and subjective question regarding tennis. It depends on a lot of factors. Federer has has won almost every tournament there is in tennis. This is similarly to the famous question: "PC or MAC?" If your referring to purely rankings, according to the ATP World Rankings for Men's Singles, Nadal is currently No. 1 w/ 12450 points and Federer is No. 2 w/ 9145 points.