Nadal beat Federer in 2008.
They are both terrific sports men. Nadal can beat Federer on a regular basis. Federer has won more titles. Nadal is only 24 and has loads of years left to get more titles than Federer. Federer was number one for the most consecutive years. Nadal is much more entertaining. Overall, I would have to say: Rafael Nadal
Roger federer is more good looking so nadal must be more ugly!
Federer: Switzerland Nadal: Spain
Federer rules! Federer is much better. P.S It is spelled Nadal not Nadel.
Since Federer was on a historic streak of 11 Majors in 4 years, Nadal was the underdog and Federer was the favorite.
Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer in the longest Wimbledon final match ever to win the men's single title in 2008. He had lost t he previous 2 finals to Federer, but finally came thru in 2008.
Nadal HAS THE MOST WINS!!!! the series between these 2 is 13-7, Therefore Nadal has beaten federer more times.
Sadly Rafael Nadal. But Lately Federer beat him the last 2 times they played.
OF COURSE HE IS! Well, in my opinion, anyway. I mean, Nadal won't ever be as graceful and perfect as Federer. But hands down, Nadal deserves a lot of credit. He works really hard!
Nadal beat Federer in the final 7-5, 3-6, 7-6(3), 3-6, 6-2
When you have break points...Like Federer broke 2/3 chances from Nadal