answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

I think horseback riding is much more dangerous. Remember that the rider of a horse has to control a 1,600 pound animal with little more than a pair of reins. Horses, like all animals, can be unpredictable. They can buck, rear, etc at any moment. And, sometimes if you fall the horse might land on you. So I believe horseback riding is much more dangerous, even though soccer can be, too.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 12y ago

Yes. Horse riding is hands down more dangerous than Gymnastics. I have done both sports so know the risks of both. I quit gymnastics because it got boring, and yes I did see what the older kids were doing. When you get on a horse, you have a HUGE risk of dying. You are controlling a 1200 pound animal (544kg) who could spook or trip at any given time. No matter how much you think you can trust your horse or they can trust you, they are an animal and they have a mind of their own. On the other hand, even though you do many filps and tricks and could fall and break a bone, the most you could possibly do is break a bone. You don't have a huge animal stepping on you or falling on top of you.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 11y ago

No, because Rugby you get hurt every time, and with horse riding, the chances are that you won't get hurt Every time.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Ailey Chidester

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 1y ago
Honey wanna look at all my riding videos I break or sprain at least 1 bone and it’s physically exhausting ur wrong smd

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 11y ago

yes

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is horseriding more dangerous than gymnastics?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is more dangerous gymnastics or rugby?

There are significantly more injuries in rugby than gymnastics. Rugby is a contact sport while gymnastics is an art form that requires a lot of strength


Is cheerleading more dangerous than gymnastics?

no Cheerleading is way more hard and dangerous. flying and stunting pyrimids scorpians dur


Is baseball more active than gymnastics?

no it is not because gymnastics requires more strength and power


Is soccer aerobic?

more than gymnastics


Does baseball burn more calories than gymnastics?

no


Is gymnastics from the 1900s harder than gymnastics today?

Gymnastics from the 1900's wasn't any more difficult than gymnastics today, however today there are far more safety measures in place. In the past there wasn't as much information about proper health and training techniques either.


Is more than gymnastics a good place?

yes,because gymnastics help you to improve/develop your agility,coordination & balance.


Is rhythmic gymnastics or gymnastics better for the 2010 Olympics for Singapore?

The Olympics in 2010 will be in Vancouver and it will be Winter Olympics. It is not yet determined where the next Olympics will be further than 2012, which will be held in London. Rhythmic gymnastics, is a form of gymnastics, just like artistic gymnastics is. With rhythmic you are performing with ribbon, balls, pins, and hoops. It is more about grace than with artistic gymnastics.


How many people in the world think that gymnastics is not a sport?

Many people associate gymnastics with flexibility. Girls are generally more flexible than boys so they think that boys can't do gymnastics. Actually gymnastics is more about your strength and ability to endure.


What pecent of people like gymnastics more than cheer-leading?

100 %


What is the comparative of safe?

Safer Walking is safer than cycling


Is cheerleading more dangerous than girls lacrosse?

girls lacrosse is actually more dangerous than cheerleading