If that time is true, you'll win every single race in High School and College, and you're probably two seconds faster than every single kid your age in the world. I'm sure you're very fast, but if you timed it yourself or had a friend time it, find someone else to do it. I imagine this time is due to human error.
15 seconds would probably be good for a 10 year old, or maybe in the 14s.
For an 8 year old the 100m is not a sprint; it is an endurance event. Any child, male or female, who can out run their fellow children aged 8 will most likely become a very good middle distance runner when older. Basically, sprint times run at this age are meaningless. Taking part and trying to win is all that matters to kids of this age.
boys 100m: under 11.8 boys 200m: under 24.5 seconds girls 100m: under 13 sec girls 200m under 27 sec. These are not outstanding times but are average to above average
A good time for an 11-year-old girl is anywhere around 15 and 16 seconds and possibly a little faster for a boy. However, speeds of over 13 seconds can be reached for both genders if you are talking about a very good runner. Most achieve over 20 seconds.
13 - 13.5 seconds
11.8 - 12.4 seconds
I do 14:89 but 15 or 16 seconds is also good
11-12 seconds
Around 8 or 9 Seconds
My daughter is eleven she does 200m in just under thirty seconds (best in her grade) and so for you a great run is twenty fiveish. My daughter is not a great sprinter she is second best and she does fifteen seconds for 100m but if you are really good you should be able to do thirteen or fourteen (on esecond difference in 100m is a lot)! Good luck
Depends, im a rugby player, about 17 stone, 6"3 and i can do it in 5.03
Easily possible. 75 seconds is actually kind of slow for only 300 yards. yes 75 seconds is really really slow. 75 seconds is like a good 500 time. To me its not a specific way how to run it you just run. Basically you sprint the whole thing and main tain a paste. That's all cause that event is a sprint.