no someone else has to touch it first
Yes, this is allowed. However it is quite rare.
It is not a goal directly from the throw unless it touches a player before it goes in.
No because I Amy said so
If their team mate passed the ball deliberately, with their feet, and the goal keeper then touches it with their hands within their own penalty area, then an indirect free kick is awarded to the opponents at the place where the goal keeper handled it.
No. The goal keeper may only touch the ball with their hands in their own penalty area.
No, in order to score a goal, all you need is for the ball to fully cross the goal line. Even if the goalie stops the ball from hitting the net, it is still a goal if the ball has crossed the line.
No, a goal may not be scored directly from a kick-in. The attempt is still considered "direct" if it touches any part of the goal apparatus or a referee. After a kick-in, the ball must touch at least one other player before going into the goal in order for it to count.
The main thing is, was the ball going in anyway? If the ball was going in and the goalkeeper gets a hand to it, it is not deemed to be an own goal. Sometimes the keeper will get a hand to it, but not enough to stop it going in, this is not an own goal. If however the ball was going a metre wide and the goalkeeper fumbles it into the net, that is an own goal.
basically - a team will carry the rugby ball, passing backwards or kicking the ball forward to reach the opposing teams goal line. The ball will then require grounding by placing the hand of the attacking player on the ball as it touches or goes over the in goal area.
It would be considered a "Goal Kick" for the defending team unless of course the ball goes over the end line between the goal posts. This would then be considered a "Goal".
Only if the ball had crossed the line of scrimmage.