yes because it is easy to aim with and the accuracy is better so you know you can shoot near the target
Chat with our AI personalities
The Spanish, and in fact all Europeans, had much better military technology than the natives.because they had guns and weapons to conquer !
No. Machine guns are fully automatic. With Gatling guns, you have put in bullets and crank at the same time but with machine guns, you have to put in bullets, place them on the ground and let them activate and they will open fire. Gatling guns cannot fire automatically, you have carry them and hold them so they can fire. Machine guns are much better than Gatling guns because they can fire thousand of rounds per minute, faster, powerful and can automatically open fire.
It depends on what you mean by "better." There is no evidence that indicates crime would go down if guns were banned. People were killing, crippling, and robbing each other LONG before guns existed.
The Focke Wulf FW-190 was far superior - it was faster, had more potent guns, and a great roll rate. However, the ME-109 was produced in larger numbers, and had sufficient guns to earn more kills than the FW-190 during WW2.
For most purposes an assault rifle would be better than a submachine gun. Submachine guns fire pistol ammunition, and so are sometimes called machine pistols. Assault rifles fire rifle cartridges, and so have a much higher muzzle velocity with consequently greater impact on the target, and a much longer effective range.