One Answer:
No, I don't think that boxing should be banned even though it is a vicious sport and is the cause of many deaths and fatal injuries. Why ban boxing when it's YOUR CHOICE to watch it or not, it also is the boxers choice to go into the ring. Nobody physically forced him to participate, so why bother making a fuss that is basically nothing to do with you... You are not being injured and you are not in the ring.
Taking away boxing would shatter boxers' (or people who one day aspire to be a boxer) dreams, as it may be the only thing they are good at. Also, if you take away boxing this would not be a democratic society and would take away the entertainment some people find in watching the sport.
It is a sport that requires skill, stamina and self discipline. It is also a sport which provides opportunities for people who have not done well at school and keep young people of the streets doing drugs, doing things that are anti-social. Take Amir khan for instance he has a positive influence on boxing.
Another Answer:
Yes, because people might get hurt.
Another Answer:
Boxing should not be banned because people have fun watching it. If boxing ends people will be bored. Also, boxers will have no jobs.
look the people who do boxing must understand the risks they are taking just like in any other sport but you see many people do not see this discipline that is needed if you play a sport i can almost guarantee that at some point you will get injured so i think that you cannot ban boxing because it would unemploy many it will take joy from many people and if you ban boxing you should ban lots of other sports too but that wont happen any time soon.
Hope this answered it well :)
boxing first was banned in Paris !!!!!!
ice skating is banned on boxing day
No.its absolutely wrong because it is a sport nd women r nt inferior
boxing
Boxing should not be banned for several reasons. Firstly, it provides athletes with a platform to showcase their skills, discipline, and dedication to the sport. Secondly, boxing has a long history and cultural significance in many societies, making it an important part of their heritage. Lastly, with proper regulations and safety measures in place, the risks associated with boxing can be minimized, ensuring the well-being of the athletes involved.
Women's boxing was first established in 1904. Although, for most of the twentieth century it was banned in most nations.
No because it gives entertainment to the world. If it should be banned then why would it be in the Olympics? The TV shows are not real and the actual sport has so much health and safety involved in it these days there is almost no painful moves involved. If it was banned then a big percentage of almost every country would be unimpressed and some may even riot against the idea.
Stockholm
zoos should not be banned
Boxing was first contested as a full Olympic sport at the 1904 Olympics. It has been contested in every Olympics since, with the exception of the 1912 games, held in Stockholm, Sweden - where boxing was banned at the time.
they should be banned because there very unhealthy
no the royal family should not be banned