god and undertaker
(2010) the undertaker is stronger than kane.
(2010) of course the undertaker is stronger than kane.
i think Kane is stronger because of how he destroyed the imposter Kane that was the undertaker.
Kane of course
Undertaker has more moves then Kane and his tombstone attack is unstoppable
Kane is much stronger, smarter, and more powerful. So Kane would win.
That's your opinion. My opinion is that he is better than Kane because he beat him one time and he is the Legend Killer. Overall Kane is better, He is stronger and he has much much more experience than orton, But on the other hand orton is alot faster and has more agility but im still gonna go with Kane.
Big Show
The Undertaker is definitely stronger because Kane is the little brother and the Undertaker can prove himself against a lot more people than Kane can but Kane is still a really good wrestler. The Undertaker has been doing this for almost 20 years and Kane has been doing this for 12 years so Undertaker has won victories over Kane and keeps winning at Wrestlemania . wrong. they are not real brothers.undertaker is stronger harder and better. more experienced aswell
Kane is eleven years younger than Ryan Kane is eleven years younger than Ryan
Big Show has got more opportunities to defeat them all. in comparing to Big daddy & Mark Henry, He is larger and faster. In comparing to Kane he is larger and stronger; also Kane is not agile and smart enough to over come. The main problem is Khali who is larger and may be stronger than Big Show; How ever Big show has defeated him to prove that he is totally greater, meaner and smarter than Punjab hero.
yes,cause batista is bether than kane