Want this question answered?
it would be difficult because he is a big ruler
Two reasons: 1) Many people -- myself included -- thought that Babe Ruth's record for home runs in a career would be impossible to break. When the Babe retired, nobody had even HALF that many home runs in a career. To come within even 200 home runs of Ruth's record was considered a super achievement. Yet Hank DID break the record. 2) More significantly, Hank did it despite the extraordinary pressure against him. About 20% of this "fan" mail as he approached the record was overtly racist hate mail, with many letters openly stating that they would kill him before he could break the record.
Hank Aaron 715th Home RunHank Aaron hit home run number 715 in 1974, to break Babe Ruth's all time career home run record of 714. Hank Aaron would end his career with 755 home runs.
No, he (or she) can in fact be a member of the House of Lords (I think) but this would be a very difficult (probably unworkable) situation. So perhaps I am saying the answer is in fact Yes....
The past tense form of the verb "break" would be "broke".
The hours were difficult, or it wasn't the career you were after
being a student of hotel management i think hard but smart work would make my career sucessful. being a student of hotel management i think hard but smart work would make my career sucessful.
It think it would be an invation of there privacy to do that.
I think USA would be the best ,in which you can try florida
I would think being deaf and blind.
If you mean "Do you think someone would take on the same career as Jane Goodall?" I would say yes because college students go to Gombe to watch her work because they want to be like her.
um because all he does is think of himself...and hes selfish? why would he think of you...when all he does is think about himself
In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.
they would die
You say, "Sorry,I think that when we break up it would break are friendship too."
NO. It would just make things difficult. Wait till they break up.
Maybe spelling (Training)