The one being used by an unskilled, un-trained individual. They will hurt more people, including themselves, then someone that knows what they are doing.
No; most martial arts historians are in agreement, that it is wrestling which holds that honor. No, actually, the first real martial art is believed to be an inian martial art known as Kalarippayattu.
no it isnt dangerous, it's so very important for a child to know martial arts, so they can defend themselves...just guide them, so that they will not be harmed!
Fencing is a form of martial art just like karate and taekwondo but the reason why not many people choose it is because it’s an armed martial arts. It’s understandable in order to defend yourself anytime, anywhere with zero preparation, an unarmed martial art is a favorable option.
The most recent "established" martial art would have to be mixed martial arts or MMA. Unfortunately there is some debate to whether or not this an original martial art because it's just an amalgamation of several techniques from other martial arts. It combines everything from Judo to Greco-Roman Wrestling.
If you're asking where martial arts was born ... Then most believe it was born in China , and that , " Kung Fu" was the first martial arts form.
Boxing
The Dance of Death
a grandmaster of the art and extremly dangerous
It is a physical activity and all such pursuits have risks. Because it is a martial art, the risk of injury can be much higher than other sports. The purpose of the art is to hurt or control the opponent, making it naturally dangerous.
Yes, Judo is a martial art that was based on JuJitsu.
Its not a martial art its a training drill.
It is Majest Martial Art.