In terms of European football and Basketball, both require a great amount of stamina and explosiveness. However, basketball requires more lateral quickness and vertical explosiveness, while European football requires forward explosiveness.
In terms of American football and basketball, each position in football requires a different type of physical strength (although everyone has to be good at almost every physical aspect).
No. Football is more physical than basketball. The average force of impact of tackles in football is much stronger than than contact in basketball.
Football, Basketball, Netball, Cricket, Badminton, Tennis
football has a goal basketball has a net football you use your feet basketball you use your hands football you use a football basketball you use a basketball football you use a pitch basketball you use a court there is loads
Playing football can improve skills in basketball by enhancing physical fitness, agility, coordination, and teamwork. The physical demands of football, such as running, jumping, and quick movements, can help athletes develop strength, speed, and endurance that are beneficial for basketball. Additionally, the strategic and tactical aspects of football, such as decision-making, spatial awareness, and communication, can translate to improved performance on the basketball court. Overall, the cross-training benefits of playing football can help basketball players become more well-rounded athletes.
Basketball,Football,BaseBall,Soccer, Basically all sport but i prefer Basketball
the physical size of person playing Baseball is less important the pro football and Basketball
Well Football is More physical and baseball is a mental thing
A basketball has little up raised spots ,like a rugby ball, for grip. A foot ball however is plain
the physical size of person playing baseball is less important the pro football and basketball
basketball is better then football!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dancing football and Basketball
Football,Basketball,Baseball