If you desire only amateurs to compete, no. If you wish to find who is actually the best at something then their employment is irrelevant.
The only danger is that a government may choose to support all it's athletes providing itself an advantage over/against a government who is unable to support their athletes.
A Lot because you need the practice to compete with the Pros.
no women were not aloud to compete in the Olympics.
Yes, you can compete in consecutive Olympic games.
Because it is something everyone can do. But I think it should be in the olympics because there are pros. in the world and they would be good to be in the olympics. I think it should be in the olympics and that is my reason.
So athletes who cannot compete in the regular Olympics can compete. They get the same sense of accomplishment, recognition and satisfaction as athletes in the regular Olympics, and people think it's important that they should be able to.
One does not have to be an amateur in order to compete in the Olympics. You just have to try out for the team.
jesse owen compete in the olympics in 1936 23rd of april
An athlete can compete in a maximum of three events at the Olympics.
Yes the world watches it and it should be a great show and competition. It brings millions in revenue to the city its held in and I'm sure not that many people would go if they weren't pros. I don't want to watch non professionals compete because it would be sloppy and uninteresting because you don't know anyones name
They compete when the olympic are held. They are one of hte few countries at all the Olympics.
its when you compete in the olympics and do theter i think
200.000 will compete