Back Catcher and Catcher are correct. I believe in Canada they are called Back Catchers, but regardless of who says what, they're both still right.
If the bat strikes the catcher's mitt, the rule is catcher's interference. The batter gains first.
bat
Not if he is still holding on to the bat. Tell the catcher to back up when this guy comes up. As always, if the umpire determines that the batter is doing the follow through on purpose he has the authority to eject the batter.
hind catcher. or just catcher.
The batter gets to take his base because the catcher has caused interference.
It s a plate appearance, but not an at bat
Try super duper hard
If the batter was in the batter's box and did not make an intentional motion with the bat to block the catcher then nothing happens. The ball is still live and in play
No way. I was playing catcher last spring when a batter threw his bat back into me after hitting the ball. I appealed to the ump and he called the guy out, even though he got a hit. Safety first.
Hit by the pitch, sacrifice, base on balls and I believe catcher's interference
A rolling bat bag. i am an experienced player and it is a lot easier on your back