No. Although Juan Martin Del Potro beat Federer and Nadal in the 2009 US Open and was the only one to do so in a Grand Slam, there have been other players to beat them both in a tournament, such as Murray at the 2010 Rogers Cup, and Djokovic at the Rogers Cup in 2007.
See 'related links' for more information.
In the 2011 tournament it was Nadal who clenched the title by beating Roger Federer in straight sets
Nadal beat Federer in 2008.
Nadal Beats Federer In Madrid For 18th Masters Win
Rafael Nadal won it by beating Roger Federer in an epic match.
Roger Federer
They are both terrific sports men. Nadal can beat Federer on a regular basis. Federer has won more titles. Nadal is only 24 and has loads of years left to get more titles than Federer. Federer was number one for the most consecutive years. Nadal is much more entertaining. Overall, I would have to say: Rafael Nadal
This is a very controversial and subjective question regarding tennis. It depends on a lot of factors. Federer has has won almost every tournament there is in tennis. This is similarly to the famous question: "PC or MAC?" If your referring to purely rankings, according to the ATP World Rankings for Men's Singles, Nadal is currently No. 1 w/ 12450 points and Federer is No. 2 w/ 9145 points.
Roger federer is more good looking so nadal must be more ugly!
Federer: Switzerland Nadal: Spain
Since Federer was on a historic streak of 11 Majors in 4 years, Nadal was the underdog and Federer was the favorite.
Federer rules! Federer is much better. P.S It is spelled Nadal not Nadel.
Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer in the longest Wimbledon final match ever to win the men's single title in 2008. He had lost t he previous 2 finals to Federer, but finally came thru in 2008.