No. The first tiebreaker is the overall win-loss record. A head-to-head sweep would only come into play if the two teams had identical win-loss records.
The Chargers did not have a better divisional record. Both teams were 3-3 in the division. The tiebreakers are head-to-head results, followed by divisional record, and then record against common opponents. That's where the Broncos were slightly better.
Yankees. Better team, better league, better division, better record.
the team which had a better regular season record
I'm guessing it's the "W-L" situation just like they do for the end of the regular season final record before the post season.
0 It is possible to win the division with no wins if all other teams also have no wins and the team has a better record by tie breakers or having tied more games than the other winless teams. But usually having a 10-6 record is sufficient to qualify for the playoffs.
2007, finished 7-9 in a tie with Chicago Bears, but the Lions had the better division record to finish 3rd in the division.
Taylor Stubblefield (Purdue '04)
the phillies finished the 2010 regular season with a better record and better team stats, so yes statistically, yes they are better
4-5 in the regular season. 0-1 in the postseason.
The Jets regular season record in the 2009-2010 season was 9-7!!! They won their last game 37-0 against the Bengals and they received a playoff berth!!!!
The Rockies regular season record in 2007 was 90-73. This record includes the one game playoff against the San Diego Padres.
No teams so far have won their division with a losing record, but if Seattle wins tonight, they will win the division and have a losing record.