No, they would not immediately be out.
England won't be automatically eliminated if they lose to Algeria. Won't they be unable to get enough points to qualify for the last 16.
India lose to England in 1987 world cup.England reaches the finals against Australia.
2 pounds
Yes.
David Beckham was disgraced at a world cup in 1998 because he was sent off, causing England to lose to Argentina on penalties. However, he redeemed himself just before the 2002 world cup when a great free kick against Greece saw England qualify for the world cup.
Britain didn't lose in World war 2. With some timely help from the US, they ended up on the winning side.
England has only won the 1966 world cup. There have been 19 world cups including the 2010 world cup. So it is safe to say that England has lost the world cup 18 times. But generally, nobody really "loses" the world cup.
there was this war and England lost
England won by 35 runs
England lost in the '98 world cup for a few reasons...Beckham's sending off did contribute to the loss, but he was not the main cause. England played exceptionally well, and were unlucky to lose. You could argue that Simeone with his acting was the cause, as Beckham barely touched him, and Simeone went down clutching his face in agony, and that the referee was a fool to be duped. You could argue that Ince and Batty who missed their penalties were the cause. You could even argue that if England had played better against Romania in the group stages, they would not have had to play against Argentina, they would have played Croatia (then unknown and making their first appearance at the WC) So Beckham was not the main reason for the loss
the best footballer in the world was voted Lionel messi
5