Much more then Australian Rugby League players
Rugby Union players. They are better publicised on the world stage. They gain more money from sponsorship deals. Rugby Union is a more popular sport so people are more willing to pay to see them.
Yes. Australia has a larger population and both countries have roughly equal proportions of rugby players amongst them.
A big time rugby star will earn: 4,173,000 krones (thats 650,000 dollars per annum), and a regular player will earn: 642,000 krones (100,000 dollars per annum). Also a little more by the NZM union of sponsorship.
One of the rugby players are Stephen James Smith If you know any more players from the Rugby team could you please add it on
Super League players earn on average £50,000 - £100,000 a year in accordance to club, skill, experience ect. If you are internationally capped your wages will rise closer to the £100,000 area. Young players and academy players can be payed as little as £10,000. However Rugby Union players earn £50,000 - £300,000 a year roughly, and even more. Hence Kyle Eastmond leaving to Rugby Union club Bath, where his wages will be significantly better than at Saint. Saints being a top flight club, most players will be earning circa £80,000 - £100,000 per year.
rugby because there are more nations that play
World-wide rugby is more popular in terms of number of players and fan bases.
technology has helped improve the alround skill of rugby players. it has helped find faults in rugby players and help improve them. it has helped reffs be more accurate and viewers enjoy beter rugby
In South Africa Rugby Union Players are paid an average of four times that of Football players who in turn urn more or less the same as the Cricket Players before the IPL Cricket Tournament was formed.
no
soccer players