As of the 2009-2010 NBA season, the Lakers are better. The Heat were the 5th seed in the East while the Lakers ended the regular season with the second best record in the league. The Lakers are considered to be title-contenders.
AS of the 2010-2011 season, the Heat are easily the better team.
heat because the lakers are out of their pride because they aint been plain so the heat win by a lifetime
Hell no. The Lakers have Kobe, the best player in the nba.
55 by the heat- just kidding but the heat are better
No
lakers coz they have the best of the best player played ever in the nba everything is posible as long they have kobe
Heck no. Celtics are good but the Lakers would stomp them so bad.
Historically, the Lakers are much better than the Thunder/Sonics franchise. This season however, the Thunder defeated the Lakers in 5 games in the Western Conference Semifinals.
i don't know there both good because on the lakers theres Kobe Bryant and on the cavs theres the lakers
the lakers because Kobe has a better mid-jumpshot than lebron and lebron barely has anybody to help him and Kobe has pau gasol Ron artest and shannon brown all lebron has is verejoe moe Williams and shaq the lakers have a better coach they have Phil Jackson the cavs just has mike brown the lakers have a better roster a better coach and more talent so the answer is very clear any questions? And by the way, that was the answer for the years before 2011. In 2011, LeBron moved to the Maimi Heat. So Lakers by a lot.
The Cleveland Cavaliers are better because LeBron James shoots the ball better than Kobe Bryant.
It depends on which year you were talking about. Currently, the Nets would get crushed by the Lakers even if the Lakers star players were absent.
If you look at the number of titles won, then the lakers have won much more.