NO!! it's better ! any nutritionist will tell you that, if you eat a bigger lunch and breakfast, and a smaller dinner it is better for you. because when you eat earlier in the day, you are more active for the rest of the day and you have more time to work it off, if you eat too much at night, the food just sits there when you sleep. not good.
They generally have a large lunch that includes a wide variety of meats such as beef, lamb, and chicken, salads, cooked patatoes, and lots of bread. They have a tradition of eating a big breakfast, a pretty decent lunch and a very small dinner
He can eat 154 big macs for lunch! 213 for dinner and 4 for breakfast
scones for breakfast, big prawn for lunch, and usually fish or raw squid for dinner.
Many dieters believe that eating a big breakfast will prevent overeating at lunch or dinner
Eat a good meal for breakfast and lunch and skip dinner, because when you have a big dinner, and go to sleep you are not working the food off. But if you don't have dinner and have a good breakfast you will work of the food in the day.
The Roman lunch was not a big meal and consisted of leftovers from the dinner of the previous day and occasionally included fish and fruit. Poor Romans eat bread or a kind of porrige in every meal.
It actually depends. I was a bulimic, and I wouldn't eat breakfast or lunch, then I'd eat dinner then throw it up. Or if I'd eat breakfast or lunch, and it was big, I'd throw it up.
She ate a big lunch; hence, she wasn't hungry for dinner.
Usually later around 8 or 9 because a big lunch is eaten during the day around 3 o clock
if i eat a big lunch, i am hungry
Your Bad?
She forgot her lunch, so she had to make up for it by eating a big dinner.