In Chess, a king can capture any other piece except another king. Getting next to a the opposing king puts you in check because it allows your king to be taken first losing the game. Moving next to the opposing queen is the same situation unless the queen moves next to the king as some sort of sacrifice ploy.
what a stupid question you capture a king!
The King is not allowed to be in check. If a piece is on a square where if the King were there, the King would in check, the King isn't allowed to capture it.
This is an example of an impossible scenario in chess. You can never capture a king; you can only checkmate it.
The king may capture any piece other than the king itself .
He can capture everything except his opponent's king.
yes
No
You capture the King piece.
The objective of chess is to checkmate the king, where the king is in check by a piece and it cannot block the check, move to another square, or capture the piece checking the king.
A checkers king can capture many pieces as long as the game rules allow. In US version, a king can only jump through a piece. As per international rules, a king can be moved any number of squares in a diagonal in a capture (or in an idle move).
A checkers king can capture many pieces as long as the game rules allow. In US version, a king can only jump through a piece. As per international rules, a king can be moved any number of squares in a diagonal in a capture (or in an idle move).
The pawn can checkmate the king but only in conjunction with at least one other piece to protect the pawn from capture by the king and at least one enemy piece placed near the king so that it cuts off any escape avenues the king would have. If a pawn places a king in check and the king is completely surrounded by his own pieces in such a way that its only move would be capture the pawn and if no enemy piece is placed so that it can capture that pawn and if the pawn is protected from capture by one of its own pieces, the pawn has checkmated the king.