In Chess, a king can capture any other piece except another king. Getting next to a the opposing king puts you in check because it allows your king to be taken first losing the game. Moving next to the opposing queen is the same situation unless the queen moves next to the king as some sort of sacrifice ploy.
what a stupid question you capture a king!
No, you cannot capture a king with a king in a game of chess.
No, you cannot capture a king with another king in a game of chess.
No, a pawn cannot capture a king in chess.
Yes, in chess, a king can capture a pawn if the pawn is within the king's reach and there are no other pieces blocking the capture.
Yes, in the game of chess, it is possible for one king to capture another king. However, this is not a common occurrence as the objective of the game is to checkmate the opponent's king, not to capture it directly.
No, a knight cannot capture a king in a game of chess.
No, a pawn cannot capture a king in a game of chess.
The King is not allowed to be in check. If a piece is on a square where if the King were there, the King would in check, the King isn't allowed to capture it.
Yes, in the game of chess, the king can capture the queen if the queen is within the king's range of movement.
This is an example of an impossible scenario in chess. You can never capture a king; you can only checkmate it.
Yes, the king can capture in chess, but only under certain circumstances. The king can capture an opponent's piece by moving to a square that is occupied by that piece, but only if doing so does not put the king in check.