Yes. In fact, a pawn can attack another piece before its first move.
Consider the following moves (written in long algebraic notation):
1. e2-e4 e7-e5
2. Bf1-a6
This sequence moves first the white, then the black kings' pawns forward two squares each. The white king's bishop is now free to move to the 6th rank - just in front of black's pawn row. In this case the black pawn on square b7 is attacking the white bishop before its first move.
Had the bishop moved 2. Bf1-b5 instead, the move 2 ... a7-a6 would result in the black queen's rook's pawn attacking the bishop after its first move.
No, a pawn cannot move backwards in chess.
Yes, a pawn can put a king in check in a game of chess by moving diagonally to attack the king if it is in its path.
Diagonal attacking is the only way a pawn can capture another chess piece , besides a En Passant capture , since this is the only way a pawn can attack or threaten another chessmen . See related link below to additional information on how a pawn moves , attacks and captures .
No, a pawn cannot capture a king in chess.
No, a pawn cannot take the king in chess.
No, a pawn cannot take out a king in a game of chess. The objective of chess is to checkmate the opponent's king, not to capture it with a pawn.
Moves in chess are determined by the nature of the pieces and the spaces available for a legal move. Any chess piece can move backwards except for the pawn - and even the pawn can move backwards in a sense, if it reaches the back of the board and is promoted.
No, a pawn cannot capture a king in a game of chess.
No, a pawn cannot take a king in a game of chess.
No, a pawn in chess cannot take a king. The game ends when the king is in checkmate, not captured by a pawn.
You can sacrifice a pawn but the rules do not allow for a player to surrender a pawn . The pawn must be captured in accordance to the rules of chess .
In chess, a pawn is typically considered to be worth 1 point.