what a stupid question you capture a king!
In 451 AD combined armies of Roman General Flavius Aëtius and Visigothic king Theodoric I squared off against Huns lead by Attila in battle of Catalaunian plains. Attila and his allies were defeated and his designs to capture Roman Gaul were thwarted.
The King is not allowed to be in check. If a piece is on a square where if the King were there, the King would in check, the King isn't allowed to capture it.
This is an example of an impossible scenario in chess. You can never capture a king; you can only checkmate it.
The king may capture any piece other than the king itself .
He can capture everything except his opponent's king.
yes
No
You capture the King piece.
The objective of chess is to checkmate the king, where the king is in check by a piece and it cannot block the check, move to another square, or capture the piece checking the king.
A checkers king can capture many pieces as long as the game rules allow. In US version, a king can only jump through a piece. As per international rules, a king can be moved any number of squares in a diagonal in a capture (or in an idle move).
A checkers king can capture many pieces as long as the game rules allow. In US version, a king can only jump through a piece. As per international rules, a king can be moved any number of squares in a diagonal in a capture (or in an idle move).