answersLogoWhite

0

That is a completely false stat. Shan Foster is mainly a spot-up shooter, which means he does little dribbling and is best at catching and shooting the ball.

The problem is that he is a little short for his position and his not a great athlete. He is also not a lights-out shooter, which shooting is his best ability. In other words, he is a poor man's J.J. Redick (a not very athletic, undersized two guard), as he cannot shoot the ball as well.

Shan Foster would be better than a very small amount of the NBA's players, if any of them. On a championship caliber team, he would be the 14th man. On a poor team (i.e. 2009-2010 New Jersey Nets), he would be the 8th man.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why isn't Shan Foster in the NBA he is better than half of the NBA's players?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp