The cricket ball has more inertia than the rubber ball because inertia is directly proportional to mass. The cricket ball is denser and heavier than the rubber ball, making it harder to change its state of motion.
It's tennis ball.
It is a ball of rubber bands. You wrap more and more on to it.
Since the lightest tenpin bowling ball is currently 6 pounds and a table tennis ball is not even an ounce, the tenpin bowling ball is heavier.
a cricket ball
A bowling ball has more inertia than a basketball because inertia is directly proportional to an object's mass. The larger mass of the bowling ball means that it will be more resistant to changes in its state of motion compared to the basketball.
The Older The Ball the more it will spin...
This is an example of inertia, specifically the difference in inertia between the two objects due to their mass. The bowling ball has more mass, so it has more inertia and requires more force to stop its motion compared to the ping pong ball.
No, the inertia of a bowling ball is greater than the inertia of a basketball due to the bowling ball's larger mass. Inertia is the resistance of an object to changes in its state of motion, and a heavier object like the bowling ball requires more force to accelerate or decelerate compared to the basketball.
Yes, a cricket ball can bounce more than twice on the ground during a cricket match. The number of bounces does not affect the rules of the game as long as the ball is still in play.
If it is a solid rubber ball it is not inflated. A hollow ball can be inflated. The more pressure inside, the "harder" the ball will be and the higher it will bounce. To much pressure and you risk rupturing the "rubber" bladder.
I think the golf ball has more inertia than ping pong ball, becuase of its weight. It is much heavy which result that it could stay at rest more, than a very lightweight ping pong ball.