0
Vuylsteke
The court awarded Vuylsteke $74,012 ($72,000 for the annual salary and $2,012 for shipping costs to move to London). Broan appealed to a state intermediate appellate court, which affirmed the award. As to Broan's argument that Vuylsteke had not taken reasonable measures to mitigate her damages, the court stated that the "question of whether a plaintiff properly mitigated damages is a question of fact. * * * Here, there is evidence in the record to support the trial court's findings." The appellate court repeated the lower court's conclusion that "under the circumstances, it was not unreasonable * * * to choose * * *to move to London." The appellate court reiterated the lower court's findings that Vuylsteke "made reasonable efforts to mitigate and was unable to find employment" and that it was "reasonable not obtaining employment of [$]25,000 in the United States."
ref:
http://academic.cengage.com/resource_uploads/static_resources/0324406029/10761/case12.htm
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the rule in vuylsteke v broan?
In the case of Vuylsteke v Broan, the rule established was that a party cannot unilaterally impose a time limit for the performance of contractual obligation unless specifically provided for in the contract. This means that one party cannot impose a deadline on the other party without mutual agreement or contractual provision.
Who won Baker v Carr?
Baker won the case.
Who won in the Rhodes v Chapman supreme court case?
chapman won the supreme court case
Who won the Rust v Sullivan case?
rust won because he had the best
Who won the case of regents v bakke?
Bakke won, he was accepted into the school.
Who won the Zorach v Clauson case?
clauson
Who won the case of Gratz v Bollinger?
Gratz
Who won the goss v Lopez case?
oatmeal
Who won the case of Virginia v black?
Black
Who won the case with Lucy v Zehmer?
lucy
Who won in the Madison v Arizona court case?
Madison won by one vote.
Who won the US Supreme Court case Schenck v. US?
The US won
