Who pay the English right know should fire them
No f.i.f.A pays the entire team not each player.
There will be 828 players in the world cup do the maths 23x36=828 simple
There is no World Cup in 2009.
Fabio Capello can take only 23 players to a world cup.
Yes and no - there is no contractual requirement to pay the players. For example, FIFA pays the FAs of the countries that play but those FAs have no obligation to pay the players and FIFA does not mandate that the players get paid by their FAs. Like the Rugby World Cup, the Football World Cup prize money is designed to develop the game in the country of the winner, not specifically to pay the players. But because established countries like Brazil, Argentina, Germany and Italy are often winning the World Cup, those countries don't need to develop game with that prize money so they tend not to. They pay the players incentives. There are no set payments and no "salaries" for the players. So while the short answer to this question might be yes, the technical answer is no in terms of knowing what they'll get or that they'll get anything at all. That is, players do not go to World Cup knowing they will get paid or knowing how much they will get. It's not like their club agreements where they know they will get 150,000 pounds a week. The reality is that if you told World Cup players that they won't get a dime, the great majority would go happily. The World Cup is not about getting paid, it's about winning the World Cup.
They are kids from the country the world cup is in. For example, the 2010 world cup is in South Africa so the kids the players stand with are from South Africa.
Bolivia has never won the World Cup.
There wasn't a 2009 Rugby World Cup
You can take 23 players in your squad for the World Cup, with 3 being goalkeepers.
Some great players not to play a world cup are David Ginola, Eric Cantona, Giovanni Elber.
64