That'll be a no.....you see, Lampard has the skills in terms of long range shots, passing, through balls, vision, stamina, spot kick taking, shot power, free kick accuracy and also has won more awards than Fabregas. Here are some of the awards Lampard's won; 1. award for 164 consecutive appearance. 2. award for runner up in world footballer of the year(2004/2005 and 2005/2006) 3. fans player of the year. 4. E.P.L player of the season. 5. E.P.L player of the month. 6. top scoring mid-fielder of the E.P.L 7. E.P.L trophy(more and more to come) 8. F.A cup(4) 9. Carling cup 10.U.C.L runners up 11. numerous awards for assist leader (EPL/UCL). If I were to count what Fabregas has one, it's not up to half of lampard's. Although, Fabregas is good, but almost as good as Lampard. After all he's won the world cup in S.A with Spain. But I don't seem to know what else he has won, except the premier league trophy which is dated some yrs back now. To conclude, Lampard is simply better than Fabregas.
Lampard!
Cesc Fabregas
Ronaldo....... Lampard really sucks!!
Nani has more skills but Fabregas has higher attribute ratings. The answer is probably Fabregas!
Difficult question. I would say Xavi is better, but Fabregas is also a great player.
Fabregas, isn't it obvious? Although they have different positions Fabregas is way better. Fabregas started younger and has come so far, he has alot more passion which makes him the better player, hence he is the sexiest guy in the whole world!
Rooney, Drogba,terry, Essien, Fabregas, Ce ch, Gerraard, Torres, Lampard andAnelka.
Mabe because fabregas is a very good midfielder .
Robben is a winger;Fabregas is a centre mid.However, Fabregas can play on the wing. In contrast, Robben can't play in fabregas's position. Overall, Robben is better because he is fast versatile and has sublime deribbling. On the other hand, Fabregas can do a 20m long pass Villa with a blindfold. It is your opinion who you think is better. lil ribery
shut up you prick Gerrard is obviously better in all ways
Messi