It is announcer-speak for when a player reaches over another player from behind, typically in a play for the ball. It is typically cited as a foul, not a violation.
Contrary to popular belief, however, it does not in and of itself constitute a foul. To be a foul, it must occur with illegal contact (and not all contact in an over-the-back situation is necessarily illegal). It is often yelled by spectators and coaches alike and, unfortunately, even called by some officials. But there is no foul called over-the-back--and it does not exist as a call available to officials, either.
over the back.
No, pushing off in basketball is considered a foul and is not allowed as it gives an unfair advantage over your opponent.
In basketball, your hand is not considered part of the ball.
Yes, hitting the hand is considered a foul in basketball.
David Robinson, of the San Antonio Spurs had collected $7.5 million dollars ( which today is considered low for basketball players, but back then that was a fortune).
Those actions are generally considered fouls in basketball. Each action has its own specific violation, such as pushing or shoving being called as a personal foul, hitting as a flagrant foul, tripping over the back as a blocking foul, and charging as an offensive foul.
No, the hand is not considered a part of the ball in the game of basketball.
Yes, stepping on someone's foot is considered a foul in basketball.
Between the legs, behind the back, shot fakes, cross over, ect.
yes
Basically, a basketball team that has dominated using roughly the same players over a period of time. For instance, the San Antonio Spurs are considered a dynasty, winning 4 championships over a span of 10 or so years from 2000-2007.
no basketball was unfortunantly not invented back then