answersLogoWhite

0

Technically there is no difference. The term "Running Back" is generally used to describe Fullbacks, Tail Backs and Half Backs. - As it used to be, full backs were the faster, smaller players in the backfield, and halfbacks were the bigger, stronger blockers. But, as the positions evolved, half backs/ tail backs are now the "feature" backs. Typically smaller and faster, and get more carries than today's full back, which is now the bigger, stronger player, who typically block for half/tail backs. - Running Backs include tail/half backs. Such as Ladanian Tomlinson, Barry Sanders, Gale Sayers, Willie Parker, etc. - Full Backs are the bigger stronger backs, and are considered a separate category from the "other" running backs. Full backs today are players like Mike Alstott, Lorenzo Neal, etc So to be explicit, when someone thinks of a "running back" they're typically thinking of a tail back, or half back, as it's more commonly referred to.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
More answers

it is a person in football that runs running plays.....

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
User Avatar

I am wondering what exactly is the definition of the "running back" position and what exactly he does and needs to be good can you answer?

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

No they are totally different. The Quarterback is the player who throws/hands off the ball. The Running Back is the player who takes the ball from the Quarterback.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is a running back?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp