0
If an infielder boots the ball from out of the base path into the base path and the runner runs in to him is the fielder guilty of interference and the runner awarded the next base?
Szykula
Rule 7.08(b)Comment states, in part:
...If, however, the runner has contact with a legally occupied base when he hinders the fielder, he shall not be called out unless, in the umpire's judgment, such hindrance, whether it occurs on fair or foul territory, is intentional...
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoIn most cases, no. A fielder has the ability to make a play on the ball. As long as he is in this act, there should be no interference
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A base runner runs into a player with the ball is he out?
yes unless he is standing on the base It is also interference. Y-THINK-Y These answers assume we are talking about a batted ball (not clear from the question). A runner hit by a ball thrown by a fielder is not out, unless his interference with the throw was intentional. It is NOT interference if the ball first passes a fielder other than the pitcher. EXAMPLE: If the runner were to be running behind the fielder, and the ball went through the fielder's legs and hit the runner, the ball is live and there is no interference. A runner hit by a fair batted ball while standing on the base is out.
When a defendant is found guilty of a tort the plaintiff is awarded compensation based upon?
When a defendant is found guilty of a tort, the plaintiff is awarded compensation based upon the damages they have suffered. This compensation is intended to compensate the plaintiff for the harm they have experienced as a result of the defendant's actions. The amount of compensation awarded may include costs for medical treatment, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses directly related to the tort.
Was an accused person guilty until proven innocent in the Roman Empire?
No, an accused person was not considered guilty until the outcome of his trial or hearing. Then he was either guilty or innocent. The only time he could be guilty without a trial was when he was caught redhanded doing a misdeed and there were witnesses to it. This was generally in the nature of petty crime, or street crime. Even in the case of major crimes, such as treason, which would be tried before the senate, a person was free and told when to report to the senate for trial. A person assumed guilty would not be awarded this freedom.
In soccer why do some players raise their hands at the end of some plays?
They are usually defenders and are appealing to the assistant referee to awarded them with an indirect free kick. They believe the attacker was guilty of an offside infraction.
If a child is in custody of the state and is out of state living with the grandmother does the father have a right to go and retreive the child?
No. You need to contact the state that has custody to determine your rights. If you go and get the child you may be guilty of custodial interference.
Is it non-guilty or not guilty?
not guilty
When did Guilty or Not Guilty end?
Guilty or Not Guilty ended on 1959-01-31.
When was Guilty or Not Guilty created?
Guilty or Not Guilty was created on 1958-10-05.
If found guilty in a hit and run?
You will be subect to the judgment of the court - be awarded DMV points against your license (or have it suspended or revoked) - your insurance company will have to pay (up to the limits of your coverage) and you will be held responsible for any remainder.
What is the opposite of guilty?
The opposite of guilty is innocentInnocent
Does a jury decides if a person is guilty or not guilty?
Yes, a jury decides if a person is guilty or not guilty.
How can a guilt ridden person be awarded capital punishment?
Guilt ridden persons do not get capital punishment. Only people found guilty of capital crimes get capital punishment . . . . . . regardless of how guilt ridden they may profess to be, after-the-fact.
